Single judge dismissed bail application where applicant failed to appear despite earlier hearings. Court noted charge sheet filed and advised filing fresh bail before Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
URMILAPRAMOD Digitally signedby URMILAPRAMODINGALE INGALE Date: 2023.01.0416:02:29 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2021 Shri Raju @ Bapu Vilas Jadhav ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 4, 2023
P.C. :
1. None for the applicant. There was no appearance on behalf of the applicant even on 09/11/2022 and thereafter on 07/12/2022. Present application was filed on 18/02/2021. Learned APP informs that the charge-sheet has been filed on 22/03/2021. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. As now the charge-sheet has been filed, in any case, it is now open for the applicant to file an application for bail before the Sessions Court. If such an application for bail is filed before the Sessions Court post filing of the charge-sheet, the same
1/2
shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
2. With these observations, the application is dismissed.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application should be allowed when applicant did not appear and charge sheet was filed.
Shri Raju @ Bapu Vilas Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
