The applicant sought leave to withdraw a bail application No. 669 of 2023. The court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the bail application is granted; application dismissed. Fees order secured for respondent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
931-ba-669-2023.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.669 OF 2023
SANTOSH ASHOK MALI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Patil
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Kasturkar Mayuri
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : JUNE 13, 2023
PER COURT:-
1. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant,
learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the victim, the
Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. Learned counsel for the
applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2.Leave granted. The application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
3.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee,
Aurangabad Bench do pay the fees of the appointed counsel for
respondent no.2/victim as per schedule.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
Mujaheed//
SANTOSH ASHOK MALI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court