The applicant withdrew the bail application. The court disposed of the matter noting the applicant was not pressing the application due to a request for time-bound trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01-ba-3882-21
1 of 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3882 OF 2021
Pramod Harishchandra Ranware..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra..Respondent
Mr. Vikas B. Shivarkar for Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 12 JANUARY 2023
PC :
1.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
applicant is in custody since 20/07/2020. The charge-sheet is
already filed but the trial has not yet commenced. He submitted
that if the trial is made time bound, then he is not pressing this
application. A request is reasonable.
2.The trial Court is requested to conclude the trial within a
period of nine months from today.
3.With these observations the application is disposed of as
not pressed.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2023.01.13 10:56:00 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Gokhale
Pramod Harishchandra Ranware
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court