Allowed

Mahadu @ Madhav Govind Kale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC23 Mar 2023BA/386/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the appellants in a murder attempt case. Leave was granted to add IPC Section 307. Bail was ordered subject to surrender of bail bonds, surety, non tampering with witnesses, maintaining absence from the village, and attending the police station.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail on furnishing Rs.50,000/- each with one solvent surety of the like amount under strict conditions.

Mahadu @ Madhav Govind Kale and Another Vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

916-BA-386-23.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2023 WITH APPLN/1093/2023 IN BA/386/2023

¶5

MAHADU @ MADHAV GOVIND KALE AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶7

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S. J. Salunke APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. P. Deshmukh Advocate for Complainant : Mr. R. D. Gaikwad

¶8

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

¶9

DATE : 23-03-2023

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

Leave granted to add Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in the application.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the applicants, the learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State and the learned counsel for the complainant.

¶13

The applicants and the injured are the relatives. They had a dispute over the land. The injured have been discharged from hospital. The weapons allegedly used in the crime with other incriminating evidence has been recovered. The material investigation has been completed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that further investigation from the

¶14

916-BA-386-23.odt

¶15

¶16

applicants is not required. However, to protect the interest of the injured, certain conditions may be imposed. Hence, the following order :-

¶17

i) The application is allowed.

¶18

ii) Applicants Nos. (1) Mahadu @ Madhav Govind Kale and (2) Ram Namdev Kale, be released on bail, on furnishing PB and SB of Rs.50,000/- each, with one solvent surety of the like amount, in C.R.No.27 of 2023, registered with Police Station Chakur, District Latur, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 325, 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, on the conditions that,

¶19

(a) They shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

¶20

(b) They shall attend the police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer on written notice till filing chargesheet.

¶21

(c) They shall remain outside the village Janwal, Taluka Chakur, District Latur, for three months from the date of their release except for the purpose of investigation, if called by the Investigating Officer on written notice.

¶22

iii) Criminal Application No.1093 of 2023 stands disposed of.

¶23

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE

¶24

rrd

Mahadu @ Madhav Govind Kale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahadu @ Madhav Govind Kale and Another v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Pralhad Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amol Rohidas Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Rama @ Pintya @ Ravan Ananda Bhusanar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shaikh Khalil Shaikh Ismail @ Mohd. Khalil Mohd. Ismail Vs the State of Maharashtra

Subhash Mahadu Mahajan Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vishnu S/O. Yadawrao Nimmalwad Vs the State of Maharashtra