Allowed

Arshad Riyaz Shaikh Alias Madrasi v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Feb 2023BA/34/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail to the applicant detained for over four years in a robbery case, upholding parity assertions and directing release on furnishing a bond with sureties or provisional cash bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed by furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/with one or more sureties in the like amount, or provisionally by cash bail security of Rs.25,000/-

Arshad Riyaz Shaikh Alias Madrasi Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

14.ba.34-23.doc

¶2

PMB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO.34 OF 2023

¶5

Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2023.02.01 19:55:27 +0530

¶6

Arshad Riyaz Shaikh alias Madrasi ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶7

Adv. Prashant Pandey a/w Adv. Dinesh Jadhwani i/b. W3Legal LLP for the Applicant. Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State. PSI-K. U. Jadhav, Mumbra Police Station is present.

¶8

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶9

DATE : FEBRUARY 1, 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. This is an application for bail by the applicant-Arshad Riyaz Shaikh alias Madrasi in connection with C.R. No.I-139 of 2018 dated 17/03/2018 registered with Mumbra Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 397, 323, 341, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 3 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and under Sections 37 read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

1/4

14.ba.34-23.doc

PMB

3. The FIR was registered on 17/03/2018. The applicant is in custody for more than 4 years and 10 months. Though the trial has been expedited by this Court, the charge is yet to be framed. It is alleged that 7 accused stopped the truck which the complainant was driving. They fled away with a sum of Rs.85,000/- and thus committed robbery. The coaccused Nos.1 and 2 have been granted bail by the Sessions Court by an order dated 01/11/2022. The applicant is alleged to be walking in front and around the victim’s truck with knife to keep a check. The trial Court while granting bail to the co-accused-Adil Wali Mohd. Pathan by the order dated 01/11/2022 in paragraph 9 has observed thus :-

¶17

“9] The accused is behind the bars since more than four years. Although other four offences have been registered against him, this alone cannot be a ground to deny the bail. Considering all these aspects in my view the accused is entitled for bail.”

¶18

4. Though there are criminal antecedents reported

¶19

against the applicant, on the ground of parity, the applicant being in custody for more than 4 years and 10 months, can be released on bail.

2/4

14.ba.34-23.doc

PMB

5. Hence, the following order :-

¶24

ORDER

¶25

(a) Application is allowed.

¶26

(b) Applicant-Arshad Riyaz Shaikh alias Madrasi shall be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.I-139 of 2018 dated 17/03/2018 registered with Mumbra Police Station, on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶27

¶28

cash bail security in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, for a period of eight weeks, in lieu of surety.

¶29

(d) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer. The applicant shall not tamper with evidence.

¶30

(e) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station once in a month on every Monday of the first week between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.

3/4

14.ba.34-23.doc

PMB

(f) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change.

¶35

6. The Bail Application is disposed of.

¶36

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶37

4/4

Arshad Riyaz Shaikh Alias Madrasi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arshad Riyaz Shaikh Alias Madrasi v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Johnny Maksad Biswas @ Moklesur Rehman Vs State of Maharashtra

Nikhil Nagesh Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra

Shailesh S. Parranshetti Vs State of Maharashtra

Shantabai Dharma Shrikhande Vs State of Maharashtra

Prashant Pandurang Aainapure Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vikrant Dipak Raut Vs State of Maharashtra