Allowed

Sandip Shashikant Patil v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Jan 2023BA/27/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay granted bail to the applicant accused of breach of peace, theft, mischief and criminal trespass under various sections of IPC. The court allowed temporary cash bail instead of surety.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in like amount or temporary cash bail surety of Rs.15,000/-.

Sandip Shashikant Patil Vs State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Darshan Patil

¶2

26-ba-27-23.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2023

¶5

Sandip Shashikant Patil ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶6

Sudatta Patil a/w Vikram Parkar for the Applicant.

¶7

Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.

¶8

Sunil R. Rane, PI, Niwati Police Station, Sindhudurg.

¶9

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 20, 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. This is an application for bail by the applicant- Sandip Shashikant Patil in connection with C.R.No. 34 of 2022 registered with Niwati Police Station, Sidhudurg, under Sections 143, 447, 427, 379, 506 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶13

3. The First Information Report was registered on 21/11/2022. It is alleged by the complainant that the applicant was responsible for breaking the boundary wall of the hotel premises of which the complainant was the manager. It is alleged that the labourers were engaged by

1/3

26-ba-27-23.odt

Darshan Patil

the applicant and the JCB operator broke the wall at the behest of the applicant. It is further alleged that there was a theft of a grass cutter worth Rs.1500/-. The grass cutter was recovered.

¶18

4. The applicant was arrested on 01/12/2022 and is in custody. Learned APP pointed out that there are 4 criminal antecedents against the applicant and in which he has been granted bail. So far as the nature of the accusations in the present alleged offence is concerned, further custody of the applicant is not required. Though the charge-sheet has not been filed, the applicant can be released on bail. Hence, the following order.

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(a) Applicant- Sandip Shashikant Patil shall be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 34 of 2022 registered with Niwati Police Station, Sidhudurg, on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶21

(b) The applicant is permitted to furnish temporary cash bail surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- for a period of 4 weeks in lieu of surety.

2/3

Darshan Patil

26-ba-27-23.odt

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer. The applicant shall not tamper with evidence.

¶26

(d) The applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every alternate Saturday of every month between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. till the charge-sheet is filed and thereafter once in a month i.e. on first Monday of every month.

¶27

(e) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change.

¶28

5. The application is disposed of.

¶29

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶30

3/3

Sandip Shashikant Patil v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandip Shashikant Patil v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sameer Ahmed Hussain Khan @ Rizwan Khan Vs State of Maharashtra

Shaziya Abutahir Shaikh and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Rajjab Chunnu Khan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Mohankumar Suvarna

Sameer Amir Shaikh and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nadir Habibullah Khan Pathan Vs State of Maharashtra