Sainath Suresh Sonawane v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail was dismissed as redundant because the Sessions Court had already granted bail to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-BA-249-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 249 OF 2021
Sainath Suresh Sonawane … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 12 JANUARY 2023
P.C. :-
. The Registry has received this application for bail, through jail. The learned APP has tendered nominal roll of the present applicant. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purpose of identification, wherein it is mentioned that the Sessions Court has released the present applicant on bail. Therefore, nothing survives in the present Application and the same is accordingly disposed of.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2023.01.12 19:10:59 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Sainath Suresh Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court