The bail application was withdrawn by the applicant. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn and directed expeditious disposal of the trial proceedings including recording statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12_ba_2210_2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.2210 OF 2022
Rahul Raju Jadhav
...Applicant (s)
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and
Anr....Respondent(s)
….
Mr. Harekrishna Mishra with Mr. Aniruddha More for the Applicant.
Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Shaheen S. Kapadia for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: G.A. SANAP, J.
DATED: 7th DECEMBER, 2023.
P.C:-
1. Learned Advocate for the Applicant/accused seeks leave
to withdraw the application.
2. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
3.Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that
recording of evidence of prosecution is over and the case is now
posted for recording statement of the accused under Section 313 of
the Cr.P.C. Learned Advocate further submits that the Applicant is
Digitally signed by MEGHA MEGHA SHREEDHAR SHREEDHAR PARAB PARAB Date: 2023.12.07 14:21:36 +0530
Megha
1/2
12_ba_2210_2022.doc
proposing to examine some defence witnesses.
4.In the factual situation learned Judge shall see that this
case is disposed of expeditiously.
5.Fees of the appointed learned Advocate be paid as per
the rules.
(G.A. SANAP, J.)
Megha
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Raju Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court