Allowed

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC27 Sept 2023BA/2159/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of an accused charged with murder. Considering the prior friendship between the accused and deceased, the possibility of unpremeditated assault was noted, leading to the decision to grant bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on bail on Rs. 25,000 bond with one or two sureties and required to appear at police station once a month.

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1-ba-2159-23.odt

¶2

Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2023.10.25 14:58:24 +0500

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2159 OF 2023

¶5

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble … Applicant Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi alongwith Mr. Ashish S. Vernekar and Mr. Samay Pawar, Advocates for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr. A.A. Palkar , APP for the Respondent-State.

¶9

CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 27 SEPTEMBER 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

This is an application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail.

¶12

The applicant came to be arrested in C.R. No.236 of 2021 registered at Hatkanangale police station, Kolhapur for the offences punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Page 1 of 3

Dinesh S. Sherla

1-ba-2159-23.odt

The deceased and applicant were friends. It is alleged that one day prior to the alleged incident which took place on 12 May 2021, dispute arose between them on account of some financial transaction. It is alleged that on account of said dispute on the date of incident, the present applicant assaulted the deceased by stone and committed his murder.

¶17

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent- State.

¶18

The applicant is in jail for about two and half years. The trial is still at the stage of charge. As the applicant and the deceased were friends, possibility of unpremeditated assault cannot be ruled out. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(i) The Application is allowed.

¶21

(ii) The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.236 of 2021 registered at Hatkanangale police station, Kolhapur for

Page 2 of 3

Dinesh S. Sherla

1-ba-2159-23.odt

the offences punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶26

(iii) The applicant shall attend the concerned police station once in a month, i.e., on first Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial.

¶27

Page 3 of 3

¶28

Dinesh S. Sherla

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Balaso Madge Vs State of Maharashtra

Akola,Amravati,Buldhana,Washim Zilla Jangal Kamgar Sah. Sansthan Cha Sangh Marya.,Thr.Pres. and Anr. vs Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Amravati and Another

Smt Vaijanta Vithal Jadhav Vs Sou Tanubai W/O Vishnu Madane

Deepak @ Marfi Jaggnath Kamble Vs State of Maharashtra

Pandurang Baba Padalkar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vikas Nathaji Kumbhar Vs State of Maharashtra