Application for bail was allowed to be withdrawn by the High Court of Bombay. The court also granted a direction to the trial court to dispose of the matter within one year due to excessive delay in framing charges.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; direction to trial court to dispose matter within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-BA-1959-2022.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1959 OF 2022
Dashrath Bhagwan Sable ...Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Dheeraj Panchange i/b Mr. Santosh Sonawane for the Applicant. Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. A. S. Pawar – PSI Khadakpada Police Station, Kalyan present.
Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2023.09.27 16:39:01 +0530
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER 2023.
P.C. :
behind bar for more than four years yet charge has not been framed.
1/2
25-BA-1959-2022.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
Hence, direction be given to dispose of the trial within six month.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
2/2
Dashrath Bhagwan Sable
State Of Maharashtra
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
