The judge rejected a second bail application by the applicant, who is accused of a serious offence under Section 302, reiterating the earlier refusal based on the gravity of the charge and the role attributed to the accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by ASHISH ASHISH SAHEBRAO SAHEBRAO MHASKE MHASKE Date: 2023.08.10 12:58:10 +0530
1/1 5 BA-1744-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.1744 OF 2023
Rohit Ravindra Gurav
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …
Mr. Kuldeep Patil i/b Ms. Saili Dhuru for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 8th AUGUST, 2023
P.C:-
1 This is a second bail application; the first being rejected by the detailed order on 22/07/2022 and the order having been upheld by the Supreme Court on 5/12/2022, the only ground which is pressed into service is that one of the co-accused has been released on bail.
I have perused the order in case of co-accused passed on 7/06/2023, but I am unable to conform myself with the observation therein. While rejecting the bail application of the applicant, who is accused of a serious offence of Section 302 with all the gravity that surfaced through the charge-sheet, I had rejected the application on merits.
There is no reason to recall the said order, as in the facts and circumstances of the case considering the role attributed to the accused in the charge-sheet, the application was rejected.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish
Rohit Ravindra Gurav
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
