The application for bail was dismissed as the trial had already commenced and the prosecution had examined five witnesses, leaving no scope for appreciation of the Bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-BA-163-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 163 OF 2022
Shriram Namdeo Gaikwad and another … Applicants Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Divesh Menani instructed by Mr. Vivek Punjabi for the Applicant. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.
PSI S.C. Kasarle, Panchavati Police Station, present.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 2 JANUARY 2023
P.C. :-
. Advocate Divesh Menani seeks adjournment on the ground that Advocate on record is not available.
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2023.01.02 18:22:11 +0530
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Shriram Namdeo Gaikwad and another
State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
