The High Court dismissed a bail application, rejecting the plea for parity as the applicant played an active role causing life-threatening injuries. It directed the Sessions Court to frame charges within three months and conclude the trial within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 38 BA-1627-23.odt
MANDIRAMILINDSALGAONKAR Digitally signed byMANDIRA MILINDSALGAONKARDate: 2023.09.2611:35:44 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1627 OF 2023
Akash @ K.D. Anil Kedare
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Kartik Garg with Mr.Abdul Wahab Shaikh i/b Mr.Mohd. Umar Kazi for the Applicant.
Mr.S.R.Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
ASI S. K. Rathod, attached to Badlapur Police Station, Thane City, present.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 25th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C:-
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 38 BA-1627-23.odt
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
M.M.Salgaonkar
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted on the ground of parity as another co-accused was released.
Whether the Sessions Court should be directed to frame charges and expedite the trial.
Whether the applicant's active role in the incident bars bail parity.
Akash @ K.D. Anil Kedare
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
