Two bail applications were allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to apply after one year if the trial does not proceed substantially. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
leave to withdraw the bail application with liberty to apply after one year if the trial does not proceed substantially.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:36824
Diksha Rane 17 BA 108023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1080/2023
KAUSTUBH KRUSHNARAO SARNOBAT ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1326/2023 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.1080/2023
MILIND NANASO SAWANT BHOSALE ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Adv. Satyavrat Joshi i/b. Adv. Shubham Mhatre for the applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2023.
P.C. :
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
KAUSTUBH KRUSHNARAO SARNOBAT
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MILIND NANASO SAWANT BHOSALE
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
