Allowed

Ishwarchand Ramkishan Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Oct 2023BA/1027/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the High Court of Bombay at Bombay granted bail to the applicant who had been in custody for over five years due to trial delays. The Court imposed strict conditions to ensure the applicant's presence at trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a P.R. bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties, one local to Thane; conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and require monthly attendance at Thane Police Stati

Ishwarchand Ramkishan Agarwal Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1/4 22 BA 1027-23.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1027 of 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2610 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2023

¶3

.. Ishwarchand Ramkishan Agarwal Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent …

¶4

Ms.Sangita Walke for the applicant. Mr.Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State. ASI M.B. Parab from Crime Branch, Thane. PSI Dipesh Kini present from Crime Branch, Thane

¶5

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 18^th OCTOBER, 2023

¶6

P.C:-

¶7

1 Application is filed claiming parity with co-accused Mohd. Maqbool Abdul Gafar Bhat, who is released on bail by this Court on 11/8/2023. On an earlier occasion, I had expressed my disinclination to entertain the application and therefore, a second application came to be filed in the backdrop of the changed circumstances, being the long period of incarceration as well as claim based on parity. Apart from this, my attention was also

¶8

Tilak

¶9

2/4 22 BA 1027-23.doc

¶10

invited to an order passed by the Sessions Judge in case of another co-accused Mohsin Mohd. Issa Khan and he also state that coaccused Mohd. Harun Shaikh who is released on bail yesterday by the Sessions Court, though the order is not available with her.

¶11

2 I have perused the order passed on 11/8/2023 which, apart from the merits of the case, have recorded that the applicant is behind bar for more than five years and he cannot be blamed for the delay in trial and his presence could be secured by imposing stringent conditions. There is no reason why the observations made in case of co-accused shall not be made applicable to the present applicant who is also incarcerated since 22/3/2018.

¶12

It is trite position of law that the liberty guaranteed under Part-3 of the Constitution would cover within its ambit not only the procedure and fairness but also access to justice and right to have speedy trial. The incarceration of a person awaiting his trial for approximately five years, definitely, deserve his release on bail only on the ground of his long incarceration.

¶13

The counsel for the applicant has placed before me the roznama from the Special case No.79/2018 and one can notice the snail-speed of the trial.

¶14

Largely, it can be seen that the trial is required to be adjourned as the accused is not produced and in fact, it is also not in dispute that not a single witness has ever been produced for

¶15

Tilak

¶16

3/4 22 BA 1027-23.doc

¶17

being examined. With 10 witnesses being cited, one can imagine the fate of the trial and length of time which it may consume for its culmination.

¶18

In the wake of the above, the applicant deserve his release on bail. However, the learned APP state that he is resident of New Delhi as he is engaged in the work of gas repairs and there is every possibility that he may not make himself available for trial. I deem it necessary to impose a condition which would ensure his presence in the trial.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(a) The Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000/with one or two sureties of the like amount, one of which shall be local sureties from Thane District.

¶21

(b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer. The Applicant should not tamper with evidence.

¶22

(c) The Applicant shall mark his attendance to Thane Police Station on first Monday of alternate month between 10 a.m to 12 noon.

¶23

Tilak

¶24

4/4 22 BA 1027-23.doc

¶25

(d)On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep him updated, if there is any change.

¶26

In view of the disposal of Bail Application, Interim Application No. 2610/2023 do not survive and is disposed off.

¶27

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

¶28

Tilak

Ishwarchand Ramkishan Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ishwarchand Ramkishan Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Ramchandra Gupta Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rehman Ramzan Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra

Mohamad Kacharoddin Pathan Vs State of Maharashtra

Appasaheb Rajaram Hakke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Balbhim Gidappa Devkar Father on Behalf of Shrikisan Balbhim Devkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Brijesh Nathuram Patel Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.