Appearing for neither party, the High Court at Bombay dismissed the arbitration petition on default by the applicant for non-appearance on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03-ARP-99-2022.DOC
2023:BHC-AS:33547
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.99 OF 2022
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Raymond Apparel Ltd. …Respondent
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED : 3rd November 2023
PC:-
1. None appears for the Applicant. Even on the previous date, the Applicant had not appeared.
2. Hence the Petition is dismissed.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 1 of 1 3rd November 2023
Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/11/2023 16:35:55
1 issue framed by the court
whether the arbitration petition should be dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant.
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd.
Raymond Apparel Ltd.
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
