Allowed

Eminence Landmarks LLP v. Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP

Bombay HC30 Nov 2023ARP/152/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court appointed Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi (Retd) as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Eminence Landmarks LLP and M/s. Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP arising from a 2017 agreement, following the Respondent's readiness to refer the case after failing to nominate an arbitrator initially.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, Retired Judge, Bombay High Court, as a Sole Arbitrator.

Eminence Landmarks LLP Vs Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

29-ARP-152-2023.DOC

¶2

2023:BHC-AS:35620

¶3

Gaikwad RD

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.152 OF 2023

¶5

Eminence Landmarks LLP …Petitioner Versus

¶6

M/s. Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP & Ors. …Respondents

¶7

Mr. Abhishek Srinivasan , for the Petitioner. Mr. Dheeraj Patil, for the Respondents.

¶8

CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 30^th November 2023

¶9

PC:-

¶10

1. The Petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to agreement dated 25^th February 2017. The Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are Limited Liability Partnership firm registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (“ the LLP Act ”). The other Respondents are partners of the Respondent No.1. The Petitioner is engaged in business of investment in real estate project and the Respondent No.1 is engaged in the business of developing real estate project.

¶11

2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that some disputes have arisen between the parties in terms of some

Page 1 of 4

30^th November 2023

29-ARP-152-2023.DOC

documents executed by and between the parties including mortgage deed with guarantee and indemnity bond. He draws my attention to Clause No.(7) of the agreement, which reads as thus:

¶16

“(7) All disputes and differences whatsoever arising out of or touching these presents or any clause or thing herein contained including the performance of the respective obligations of each of the Parties hereto during the subsistence of this Agreement, shall be referred by the Parties hereto to in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to three Arbitrators, one to be appointed by each party and which two Arbitrators shall appoint a third Arbitrator as the presiding Arbitrator and any decision of the majority of the said Arbitrators made on the point of reference to them shall be final and binding on the Parties hereto.”

¶17

3. Pursuant to the dispute that arose between the parties, the Petitioner issued a notice dated 25^th March 2023 to the Respondents calling upon them to nominate an arbitrator in terms of the clause of the agreement and accordingly communicate the same to the Petitioner. However, there was no reply from the Respondent. In these circumstances, the Petitioner has approached this court seeking appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶18

4. Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Respondents states, on instructions, that the Respondent is also ready to refer the disputes for arbitration. In the circumstances, I pass the following order:

Page 2 of 4

30^th November 2023

29-ARP-152-2023.DOC

ORDER

Hon’ble Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, Retired Judge, Bombay High Court, is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to enter reference and adjudicate the disputes between the parties out of the agreement dated 25th February 2017. The seat of the arbitration shall be Pune.

¶24

The learned Sole Arbitrator shall forward a statement of disclosure as per the requirement of Section 12(1) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 to the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court to be placed on record of this Petition with a copy forwarded to both the parties.

¶25

At the first instance the parties shall appear before the learned Arbitrator within a period of ten days from the date of uploading of this order or on such date that may be fixed by the Sole Arbitrator.

¶26

All contentions of the parties on merits of the disputes are expressly left open.

¶27

The fees payable to the Arbitral Tribunal shall be in accordance with the Bombay High Court (Fee payable to the Arbitrator) Rules, 2018 which shall be borne by the parties in equal proportion.

¶28

Page 3 of 4 30^th November 2023

¶29

29-ARP-152-2023.DOC

¶30

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms. There will be no order as to costs.

¶31

Office to forward a copy of this order to the learned Sole Arbitrator on the following address:

¶32

“Hon’ble Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, Retired Judge, Bombay High Court, Bungalow No.12, Bhagya-Chintamani Society, Paud Road, Opposite Kachara Depot, Kothrud, Pune. Mobile No. 9657188676 Email ID: [email protected]”

¶33

(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)

¶34

Page 4 of 4 30^th November 2023

Eminence Landmarks LLP v. Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eminence Landmarks LLP v. Gagan Platinum Spaces LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kailasnaryan Agarwal Vs Limitless Hospitality LLP and Ors.

Manjusha Nishikant Shinde Vs Mohhammadlliyas Harun Rashid Bhokre

Snehal Tatoba Londhe and Anr. through Smt Sangita Sunil Sawalajkar Vs Tatoba Ramesh Londhe

Uma Construction Co. Thr. Its Mr. Deepak Limbani Vs Ravinanda Landmarks UNIT-5 and Others

Skipper Limited vs Zeeco India Private Limited

Sanvo Resorts Private Limited a Company Incorporated Mumbai- 400080 Vs Samshet Balkrishna Shetye