This application for appointment of an arbitrator was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party had appeared at any hearing date.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06-ARP-101-2022.DOC
2023:BHC-AS:29033
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.101 OF 2022
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Raymond Ltd …Respondent
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 3rd October 2023
PC:-
1. The Petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences arising between the parties in terms of undated agreement of January 2018. The Petition was filed on 6th May 2022. The record of proceedings show that neither the Petitioner nor his Counsel have appeared in the matter for even a single date.
2. In view of this, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 1 of 1 3rd October 2023
Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 04/10/2023 16:28:35
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd.
Raymond Ltd
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
