Two criminal revision applications were disposed of based on consent terms filed by the parties, with the court condoning a 59-day delay in one application.
Delay of 59 days condoned; both matters disposed of based on consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 42.revnst.5425.2023+1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (St) (REVN) NO. 5425 OF 2023 Vinith Anand Bajaj
.VS.
Pradhnya Dinesh Agarwal WITH
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (REVN) NO. 90 OF 2023
Pradhnya W/o. Vinit Bajaj .VS.
Vinith Anand Bajaj and Anr.
_______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr P. N. Sanghi, Sr.Advocate for the applicant in Revnst.5425 of 2023 and for non-applicant No.1 in Revn 90 of 2023
Ms Deepa Charlewar, Advocate (appnt) for the applicant in Revn 90 of 2023
Mr Amit Chutke, APP for the non-applicant No.2/State in Revn 90 of 2023
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : JULY 17, 2023.
Criminal Application (APPR) NO. 215 OF 2023
Heard.
4. Revision be registered.
2 42.revnst.5425.2023+1
Criminal Revision Application (st.) No. 5425 of 2023 with Criminal Revision Application No. 90 of 2023
(G. A. SANAP, J.)
Namrata
Signed By:NAMRATA YOGESH DHARKAR P. A. High Court Nagpur Signing Date:17.07.2023 19:08
Vinith Anand Bajaj
Pradhnya Dinesh Agarwal
Pradhnya W/o. Vinit Bajaj
G.A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
