The High Court recalled the non-bailable warrant against the applicant due to an advocate's mistake. The applicant deposited Rs. 15,000 as part of the required compensation of Rs. 30,000. The matter was disposed of under these terms.
The order of non-bailable warrant was recalled and the criminal application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46 revn4.22.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.1 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2022
Hanumant M. Jangantiwar Vs. Sanjay Raghunath Tumane and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Shri I.S. Charlewar, Advocate for applicant. Shri S.A. Ashirgade, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : JANUARY 04, 2023.
Heard learned advocate for the applicant. The applicant is present.
2 46 revn4.22.odt
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2022
JUDGE
Wagh
2 issues framed by the court
whether the order recalling the non-bailable warrant should be allowed
whether the deposited amount of compensation is sufficient
Hanumant M. Jangantiwar
Sanjay Raghunath Tumane
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
