Cr. App raised a clerical correction regarding the surname of the respondent's Advocate. The single-judge bench allowed the application, corrected the text, and disposed of the matter.
Allowed the application; corrected the spelling of Advocate's surname in para 8 and 14; disposed of the criminal applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7 appr.190.23.odt..odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 190 OF 2023 (APPR) IN
CRIMINAL REVISION NO.116 OF 2015
Madhuri w/o Rajesh Badge
.Vs.
Rajesh s/o Dataraj Badge
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Mrs. Sneha Dhote, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : 20/06/2023
It is stated that surname of respondent’s Advocate
is wrongly typed as Dhopte instead of Dhote. It is submitted that this correction is necessary.
(G. A. SANAP, J.)
manisha
Madhuri w/o Rajesh Badge
Rajesh s/o Dataraj Badge
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
