This judgment condones a delay of 702 days in filing a criminal appeal by the original accused due to financial hardship. The application is allowed, and the registry is directed to register the appeal.
The delay of 702 days in filing the criminal appeal was condoned; the application stood allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cria-990.21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.990 OF 2021 IN APPEAL ST/2750/2021
RAJU RAGHUNATH DABHADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
... Mr. Sopan G. Bobde Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A.M. Phule, A.P.P. for Respondent - State.
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2023
ORDER :
for respondent – State.
been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-7, Aurangabad on 19th March 2019.
cria-990.21
2
[ABHAY S. WAGHWASE] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
asb/SEP23
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 702 days in filing the criminal appeal can be condoned.
Whether the order of conviction under Section 302 IPC requires condonation of delay in appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Raghunath Dabhode
The State of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
Abhay S. Waghwashe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
