The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad condoned a delay of 210 days in filing a revision application. The revision was registered, a notice was issued to respondents, and the matter was listed for future proceedings.
Delay of 210 days condoned; revision registered; notice issued to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
941 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.907 OF 2020
IN REVNST/76/2020
SIDRAM IRAYYA DIDDI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.R. Gundecha
APP for Respondents: Ms. P.V. Diggikar.
CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2023
ORDER :-
Considering the reasons given in the application and after
considering the opposition from the learned APP, case is made out to
condone the delay.
2.Delay of 210 days caused in filing the revision application is
condoned. Revision be registered.
3.On registration of revision, issue notice to respondents
returnable on 17th October, 2023.
4.Call for R.&P.
5. Appearance of Mr. Shermale, stands discharged.
JUDGE
grt/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the revision application can be condoned.
Whether the revision application should be registered.
Sidram Irayya Diddi
The State of Maharashtra
S.G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court