The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a discharge application filed by the applicant as withdrawn. Fees for an appointed advocate were directed to be borne by the Legal Services Authority.
Applications dismissed as withdrawn. Fees of appointed advocate quantified and directed to be paid by Legal Services Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.600 OF 2021
WITH APPLN/551/2021
ABDUL SAEED ABDUL WAHAB SHAIKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Rohit Patwardhan, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. P.G. Borade, APP, for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Sujit A. Patil for Respondent No.2. (Appointed).
...
CORAM:SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI &
R.M. JOSHI, JJ
DATE:JANUARY 03, 2023
PER COURT :
1.Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant
states that Applicant would be filing discharge
application. On instructions, he seeks leave to
withdraw the application.
2. Applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
3.Fees of appointed Advocate are quantified @
Rs. 6,000/- to be paid by High Court Legal Services
Authority.
(R.M. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J)
Page 1 of 1
Malani
Abdul Saeed Abdul Wahab Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court