Manu Jitesh Gupta v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/442/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application for withdrawal was permitted. The criminal application was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted for unconditionally withdrawing the Application; disposed of.
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Permission granted for unconditionally withdrawing the Application; disposed of.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
33-APPLN-442-22.odt
¶2
1 / 1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.442 OF 2022
¶5
Manu Jitesh Gupta
¶6
.... Applicant
¶7
versus
¶8
The State of Maharashtra & Ors..... Respondents
¶9
Ms. Poonam Bodke Patil, Advocate for Applicant.
¶10
Ms. Sangita D. Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent.
¶11
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 06th DECEMBER, 2023
¶12
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Manu Jitesh Gupta
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
SARANG V. KOTWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Koushik Pradip Marathe and Ors. Vs the Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Sangeeta Bhagwan Patil Vs Bhagwan Maharu Patil
Shivtirth Dudh Dairy through Mr Phokane Shivaji Eknath Vs the Nashik Merchant Co. Op Bank Ltd. Nashik through Mr Pisal Santosh Vasantraoand Anr.
Kalpesh Rajendra Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra