Santosh Ramkrishna Badar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a bail application in an appeal against conviction and sentence for POCSO offences. The court continued the suspended sentence pending the applicant's compliance and mandated reporting of address details.
What did the court decide?
Interim order continued; applicant directed to update police with address/mobile details and not contact victim; bail to be cancelled if order violated.
What the court decided
1
923.Cri.Appln.-4273-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4273 OF 2022
IN APEAL/968/2022
SANTOSH RAMKRISHNA BADAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Adv. Ashwini A. Lomte h/f Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J
APP for Respondent No.1/State : Mr. P. M. Kulkarni
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Adv. Harsha R. Lomate (appointed through
Legal Aid)
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY 2023.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspended sentence of imprisonment should be revoked due to the failure of the applicant to serve the victim before the court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SANTOSH RAMKRISHNA BADAR
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- respondent
ANOTHER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Bhagwatsingh Jogsingh Rajput @ Bhagu Vs the State of Maharashtra
Bharat Vithoba Tupe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another
M/S. Kaverri Seed Company Limited, Aurangabad and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another
Naser Abdul Gani Khan (Deceased) through Manager, Sonu Plastic Workd Shaikh Mujib Khudabaksh Vs Shaikh Salim Shaikh Harun (Punawala)