The applicants sought leave to withdraw a criminal application. The court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
935 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.410 OF 2023
BASUDEV MATOLIRAM AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. R.C. Bora h/f. Mr. Shaikh Faiyazuddin APP for the respondent – State : Mr. V.S. Badakh
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 17 MARCH 2023
PC :
Learned advocate for the applicants, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the application.
[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
BASUDEV MATOLIRAM AGRAWAL AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
MANGESH S. PATIL
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
