Single Bench allowed applicant's criminal application for condonation of 33-day delay in filing leave to appeal against acquittal, ordered registration of appeal.
Criminal Application No. 1973 of 2022 allowed; delay of 33 days condoned; Office to register Application for leave to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) cria1973.22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
43 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1973 OF 2022
IN ALPST/5333/2022
JALINDAR MARUTI CHAURE VERSUS BALASAHEB RAMKISAN BHALAKE
Mr.K.N. Bhosale, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr.Nikhil Jaju, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM: KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATED: 08.02.2023
PC :-
01.Heard both the sides. This is an application seeking condonation
of delay of 33 days caused in filing Criminal Application seeking leave to
appeal against acquittal.
02.For the reasons stated in para 3, this Court finds that case is made
out to condone the delay. Hence, the Criminal Application No. 1973 of 2022
is allowed. Delay of 33 days is condoned. Office to register Application for
leave to appeal.
[KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
snk/2023/FEB23/cria1973.22
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 33 days in filing criminal application seeking leave to appeal against acquittal is permissible.
Whether the valid reasons for the delay support condonation of the time limit for filing the appeal.
JALINDAR MARUTI CHAURE
BALASAHEB RAMKISAN BHALAKE
KISHORE C. SANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court