Sangita W/O. Navnath Aswar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/1814/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1814 OF 2023 IN APEAL/431/2023 WITH APEAL/431/2023
SANGITA W/O. NAVNATH ASWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. C. C. Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant Ms. V. S. Choudhari, APP for the respondent/State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. (VACATION JUDGE) DATE : 11th MAY, 2023
P. C. :-
imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 21 of POCSO Act. The applicant is on bail. There is no likelihood of hearing of the appeal in short time and therefore if the substantive sentence imposed against her is not suspended, the appeal shall become infructuous.
and ‘C’. Applicant be released on bail on her furnishing PR bond
1 of 2
920.ca1814.23.odt
of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) VACATION JUDGE
ssp
2 of 2
920.ca1814.23.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant ad-interim bail to the applicant pending decision of appeal in a POCSO offence case.
SANGITA W/O. NAVNATH ASWAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court