Allowed

Tushar Ajit Bansode and Anr. v. Shanam Tushar Bansode and Anr.

Bombay HC13 Mar 2023APPLN/111/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought transfer of Domestic Violence proceedings from Gadchiroli to Mumbai Family Court. Court held that since matrimonial proceedings were transferred to the Family Court, DV proceedings should also be transferred there for consistency and justice. Application allowed and proceedings transferred.

What did the court decide?

Domestic Violence proceedings bearing No. 50 of 2021 transferred to Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai.

Tushar Ajit Bansode and Anr. Vs Shanam Tushar Bansode and… — Domestic Violence | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

17-APPLN-111-2022.doc

¶2

Ghuge

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2022

¶5

Tushar Ajit Bansode and Ors … Applicants V/s. Shanam Tushar Bansode and Anr … Respondents

¶6

Ms. Meghna Gowalani for the applicants. Mr. Anand Mishra for respondnet. Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the State.

¶7

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 13, 2023

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

The husband has filed present application seeking transfer of D.V. Proceeding bearing No.50 of 2021 pending before the learned 2^nd Civil Judge Junior Division and Metropolitan Magistrate, Gadchiroli to learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mulund or any other court having jurisdiction in the district Mumbai.

¶10

The applicant had filed Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 376 of 2022 seeking transfer of proceedings pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Gadchiroli to the learned Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai. This Court by order dated 17^th February, 2023 allowed said application and transferred Marriage Petition pending before learned 2^nd Civil Judge Junior Division and Metropolitan Magistrate, Gadchilori to the learned Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai.

¶11

¶12

17-APPLN-111-2022.doc

¶13

Learned advocate for the respondent wife contested the application and submitted that grave prejudice would be caused to the wife if such transfer to be allowed.

¶14

This Court in order dated 17^th February, 2023, has dealt with similar objection raised by the wife. If the civil proceeding in relation to the marriage between the parties has been transferred to the Family Court, in my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice to transfer the D.V. Proceedings to the same where the proceeding came to be transferred by order of this Court.

¶15

For the reasons stated in the order dated 17^th February, 2023 in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 376 of 2022, this Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

¶16

The proceeding bearing No. PW DV No.50 of 2021 pending before the learned 2^nd Civil Judge Junior Division, and Metropolitan Magistrate, Gadchiroli stands transferred to learned Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai and to be heard by the same Court dealing with civil proceedings between parties.

¶17

The Criminal Application stands disposed off in the above terms. No costs.

¶18

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶19

Tushar Ajit Bansode and Anr. v. Shanam Tushar Bansode and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tushar Ajit Bansode and Anr. v. Shanam Tushar Bansode and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Snehal Alankar Vs Anand Laxmi Jwellers and Anr.

Balvinder Singh Sohan Singh Sarai Vs Manjit Kaur Ravinder Singh Sarai and Anr.

M/S. Mkv Engineering through Its Proprietor Mr. Venkatesh K. Chellam Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Trupti Kishor Vajani Vs Hella Infrastructure Private Ltd. and Anr.

Petrus Lambertus Maria Hermans Vs Income Tax Officer Acit Tds 1-3 Mumbai and Anr. Respondent No. 1

Dnyaneshwar Shantram Rode Vs Dilip Namdeo Dherenge and Ors.