Allowed

Maruti Raosaheb Rakh v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 Jan 2023APPLN/107/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal application under Section 379 CrPC, the High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicant's petition. The court suspended the applicant's rigorous imprisonment sentence of one year pending the disposal of the revision and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

The sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one year is suspended till the disposal of the revision, and the applicant is released on bail.

Maruti Raosaheb Rakh Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

48-CrAn-107-23.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2023

IN REVN/7/2023

MARUTI RAOSAHEB RAKH

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶9

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. V. Dixit h/f. Mr. Ankush N. Nagargoje APP for Respondent : Mr. S. P. Sonpawale

¶10

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

¶11

DATE : 09-01-2023

¶12

PER COURT :-

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶14

Issue notice to the respondent.

¶15

The learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for the

¶16

respondent.

¶17

The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has a good case on merit. However, the evidence has not been properly appreciated. Hence, he has been erroneously convicted of the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

The learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State would submit that there are two concurrent judgments against the applicant. Hence, sentence may not be suspended.

¶19

48-CrAn-107-23.odt

¶20

¶21

Perused the impugned orders.

¶22

There appears no material to point out that the applicant has jumped over the bail granted to him. The applicant has a good case for arguments. Therefore, the sentence is liable to be suspended till the decision of the revision. Hence, the following order :-

¶23

i) The application is allowed.

¶24

ii) The order sentencing the applicant to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chopda, District Jalgaon, in S.C.C.No. 210 of 2009, dated 30.03.2019 and confirmed by the learned District Judge-2, Amalner, District Jalgaon, in Criminal Appeal No.11 of 2019, by his judgment and order dated 02.01.2023, is suspended till the disposal of the revision.

¶25

iii) The applicant be released on bail, on furnishing PB and SB of Rs.50,000/-, with one solvent surety of like amount.

¶26

iv) Bail before the learned District Judge-2, Amalner, District Jalgaon.

¶27

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE

¶28

rrd

Maruti Raosaheb Rakh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maruti Raosaheb Rakh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amol Rameshwar Anandkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dnyandev Dattatrye Shete Vs Sachin Ashok Damare and Others

Shaila W/O. Sadashiv Devre and Anr. Vs Sadashiv S/O. Bhaginath Devre

Gurulalsingh Kulwantsingh Sandhu Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kamalbai W/O. Gopinath Rathod Vs Ruksana W/O. Afsar Sayyad

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sandip Ganesh Walvi