In appeal against an order dismissing a cheque bounce complaint under Section 256 CrPC, the High Court granted leave to appeal. The applicant contended the trial court erred in dismissing the proceeding in absentia.
Leave to file the appeal on merits was granted. Appeal registered and placed for hearing after three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
57appa1125.2017.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 1125/2017
Ravi s/o Subhash Jain V/s Sutharam Shiva Bramahachari
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. C.F.Bhagwani, counsel for applicant.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 07/08/2023.
rkn
2
57appa1125.2017.odt
learned counsel has pointed out the various arguable points which shows that he has every chance of success in the present appeal.
Criminal Appeal No. ______/2023
JUDGE
Signed By:RAJESH KRUSHNARAO NANDURKAR
Signing Date:08.08.2023 18:13
rkn
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against an order dismissing a complaint under Section 256 of the CrPC.
Whether the absence of the appellant contravened procedural requirements for the report of an arrest warrant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi s/o Subhash Jain
Sutharam Shiva Bramahachari
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
RAJESH KRUSHNARAO NANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
