The High Court of Bombay, while allowing the appellant to withdraw Appeal No. 441 of 2015 (arising from Company Petition No. 644 of 2013), dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The interim application was also disposed of.
Leave to withdraw appellants appeal was allowed. Appeal dismissed. Interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MEERA MEERA MAHESH MAHESH JADHAV JADHAV Date: 2023.03.18 11:44:50 +0530
902-app-441-15.doc
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.441 OF 2015
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.644 OF 2013
IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd.
….Appellant
V/s.
Hubtown Limited…Respondent
----
Mr. Aditya Mehta i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas for Appellant.
Mr. Yash Dhruva a/w Mr. Harsh Sheth for Respondent.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
RAJESH S. PATIL JJ
DATED : 17th MARCH 2023
P.C. :
1 Mr. Mehta seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal dismissed aswithdrawn.
2 Interim application, if any, also stands disposed.(RAJESH S PATIL, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Meera Jadhav
IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd.
Hubtown Limited
K.R. SHRIRAM
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court