Dismissed
Sanjay Rambhau Sonawane and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPL/85/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sonawane. 18-APL-85-2016.doc IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2023.10.25 Chitra Sonawane. 18:50:15 18-APL-85-2016.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Application No.85 of 2016
Sanjay Rambhau Sonawane & Anr.…Applicants.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra…Respondent.
None for the applicants.
Ms SD Shinde, APP for Respondent/State.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 25 October 2023.
P.C. :
The office notings show that the applicant has not
supplied correct residential address of respondent No.2 till
date. It further appears from the record that the learned
Counsel for the applicant on 1.11.2017 sought three weeks
time to adopt appropriate proceedings to serve respondent
No.2. However, till date, no such steps were taken by the
applicant.
2.Today, none present for the applicant. The matter is
pending since 2016.
3. The learned APP informs the Court that as against both
Page No. 1 of 2
____________________________________________
25 October 2023
Chitra Sonawane. 18-APL-85-2016.doc
the applicants, report u/s 169 CrPC was already submitted on
17.04.2018.
4. In view of this, the application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[R. N. Laddha, J.]
Page No. 2 of 2
____________________________________________
25 October 2023
Sanjay Rambhau Sonawane & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court