Criminal Appeal abated as the original respondent accused died during pending proceedings. The High Court disposed of the appeal without interference in the acquittal order.
Criminal Appeal abated and disposed of; no interference in the order of acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:28059
1/1 3apeal 867.06.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Criminal Appeal No.867 of 2006
The State of Maharashtra ... Appellant v/s.
Tukaram Mahadev Khandagale since deceased through legal heirs Smt. Sakhubai T Khandagale & ors. … Respondents
Mr HJ Dedhia, APP for the State.
Mr Abhinav Bhatkar i/b Mr Vijay Killedar for the respondents.
CORAM : R.N.LADDHA, J.
DATE : 25 September 2023
P.C. :
This is an appeal against acquittal. Learned APP points out that the respondent-original accused Tukaram Mahadev Khandagale has expired on 14 August 2016. The death certificate is already filed on record.
R.N. LADDHA, J.
Lata Panjwani, P.S.
The State of Maharashtra
Tukaram Mahadev Khandagale
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court