Appeal allowed to be withdrawn after both sides filed a joint statement noting the filing of a 'B' Summary report by the investigating agency.
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn with instructions regarding notice if 'B' Summary report is not accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03-apeal-844-19
1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 844 OF 2019
Parashuram @ Prashant Hariba Chavan..Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr...Respondents
Ms. Ashwini Jadhav i/b. Anita A. Agarwal for Appellant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 7 JANUARY 2023
PC :
1. In this Appeal, learned counsel for the Appellant, as well
as, learned APP make a joint statement that the investigating
agency has filed ‘B’ Summary report in the competent Court.
2.In view of this development, learned counsel for the
Appellant does not press this Appeal at this stage and seeks
permission to withdraw it.
3.The Appeal is, therefore, allowed to be withdrawn. In
case the ‘B’ Summary report is not accepted by the competent
Court and if the situation so demands, the Investigating Agency
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2023.01.07 14:45:29 +0530
Gokhale
2 of 203-apeal-844-19
shall give four clear working days notice to the Appellant, so that,
the Appellant can take appropriate steps to protect himself.
4. With these observations, the Appeal is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Parashuram @ Prashant Hariba Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court