A single judge discharged an interim protection order made in 2021. The prosecution stated interrogation wasn't needed, making the interim protective order absolute.
Interim order dated 03.12.2021 made absolute; appeal disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(8)APeal-812-2021.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.812 OF 2021
Deepak Gurunath Bhoir ] .. Appellant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
Mr.Aniket Nikam a/w Piyush Toshniwal i/b Vivek Arote for the Appellant. Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for State-Respondent No.1. Mr.Prasad Kulkarni for Respondent No.2.
ASI Kiran Majkar, Bhiwandi Taluka Police Station present.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 10th April, 2023
P.C.
1] The Appellant is admitted to protection from arrest by order dated 03.12.2021 by recording a prima facie case in his favour.
He was directed to join investigation and it is submitted that pursuant to the investigation being complete, charge-sheet has been filed.
2] Today the learned APP on instructions of the Investigating Officer specifically state that custodial interrogation is not necessary.
3] In the wake of aforesaid statement, interim order dated 03.12.2021 is made absolute.
Appeal is disposed off in the aforesaid terms.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Deepak Gurunath Bhoir
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
