Correction motion to rectify a clerical error in minutes regarding advocates' names associated with Criminal Appeal No. 420 of 2016 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1-CriAppeal-420-2016+
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 420 OF 2016
The State of Maharashtra
… Appellant
Versus
1.Nandkishor s/o Balreddy Kolyame (Koltame),
Age : 29 years, Occu. Agri.,
R/o. Sastapur, Tq. Basavkalyan,
Dist. Bidar (KS).
2.Subhash s/o Virbhadrappa Kumbhar,
Age : 46 years, Occu. Teacher,
R/o. Basavkalyan, Tq. Basavkalyan,
Dist. Bidar (K.S.)… Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2016
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 419 OF 2016
Mrs. Vaishali S. Choudhari, APP for Appellant-State
Mr. Abhay D. Ostwal a/w Mr. Pavan M. Salunke and Mr. Saurabh S.
Munot, Advocates for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Deepak K. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM :SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATED :14 SEPTEMBER 2023
PER COURT :-
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
P1-CriAppeal-420-2016+ -2-
2. A motion is made for speaking to minutes of the common judgment dated 12.09.2023 as in the said judgment, appearance of Advocates appearing for the respondents in Criminal Appeal No. 420 of 2016 has inadvertently been shown as “Mr. Sunil B. Jadhav – Advocate for respondents”. The same should be read as under:
“Mr. Abhay D. Ostwal a/w Mr. Pavan M. Salunke and
Mr. Saurabh S. Munot, Advocates for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Deepak K. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent No.2.”3. The motion is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
[ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]
vre
State of Maharashtra
Nandkishor s/o Balreddy Kolyame (Koltame)
Subhash s/o Virbhadrappa Kumbhar
Vibha Kankanwadi
Abhay S. Waghvashe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court