The appellant, seeking appeal against an acquittal of respondent No.1, appeared before the High Court. Upon informing that respondent No.1 had expired, the court held nothing survived in the appeal and disposed of it without adjudication on merits.
The criminal appeal is disposed of as nothing survives due to the death of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
27-apeal-345.08.doc
BIPINDHARMENDER Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2023.10.07 16:35:17 PRITHIANI +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 345 OF 2008
Girish Hanmant Kale … Appellant
Versus
… Sanjay Ambadas Waikar & Anr. Respondents
Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for the Appellant.
Mr. Ajay Raje Nimbalkar i/by S. S. Patwardhan for the Respondent No.1.
Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 7 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. This appeal is filed against the acquittal of respondent No.1 in STC No.1486 of 2001 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Solapur, on 28 November 2007.
4. The appeal stands disposed of.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Girish Hanmant Kale
Sanjay Ambadas Waikar
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
