Ravindra Narayan Vaze v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court observed that the charge-sheet material, including audio transcripts, failed to substantiate an offence under Section 3(1)(u) of the SC/ST Act as there were no casteist remarks or references to the complainant. The Court confirmed interim protection orders for the four appellants.
What did the court decide?
Interim protection orders dated 12.01.2022, 19.01.2022, and 21.01.2022 were confirmed in favour of all appellants subject to the same terms and conditions.
What the court decided
(12)APEAL-34-2022.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.34 OF 2022
Ravindra Narayan Vaze ]
.. Appellant
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
WITH
APPEAL NO.21 OF 2022
Ram Dashrath Patil ] .. Appellant
vs.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the material alleged in the charge-sheet substantiates the offence under Section 3(1)(u) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 regarding casteist re
Whether the interim protection orders admitted in favour of the appellants warrant confirmation given the filing of the charge-sheet.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ravindra Narayan Vaze
- appellant
Ram Dashrath Patil
- appellant
Santosh Bahadur Amate
- appellant
Sachin s/o Kisan Chavan
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court