Criminal appeal where appellant sought anticipatory bail. Court accepted counsel's submission that subsequent developments rendered the appeal infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
7.apeal.133-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.133 OF 2020
Sanjay Vitthal Jagtap ….Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.....Respondents
Mr. Ghanasham S. Jadhav, Advocate i/b. Prashant S. Hagare, for
Appellant.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2023
P.C. :
1.Learned counsel for the appellant states that the
appellant was arrested and is released on regular bail in
connection with the present subject matter of this appeal. In the
PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE
Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2023.01.16 11:03:09 +0530
appeal, the relief in the nature of anticipatory bail order is
sought. He submits that because of these subsequent
developments, the appeal has become infructuous. The
statement is recorded and accepted.
2.The appeal is disposed of as being rendered
infructuous.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 of 1
Deshmane(PS)
Sanjay Vitthal Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court