The single judge held that the present appeal from order became infructuous because the impugned order arose from a regular civil suit No. 52 of 2015 which was disposed of during the pendency of the appeal.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-AO-72-2016.odt
Pooja K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 72 OF 2016
Bajirao Girjaji More … Appellant Versus Bhima Yadav Thorat and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. P.S. Shinde – Advocate for Appellant
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 5th January, 2023
PER COURT :
[ GAURI GODSE ] JUDGE
1/1
Bajirao Girjaji More
Bhima Yadav Thorat and Ors.
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
