The High Court of Bombay allowed an appeal to be withdrawn with liberty to file a new appeal, and disposed of the accompanying interim stay application as infructuous.
Leave to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to file a new Appeal; Interim Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 1/1 36-AO-175-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 175 OF 2023
ALONGWITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2205 OF 2023
Ms. Rita Mohan Kaul alias Ruby Kaul ...Appellant V/s. Mr. Vinjay Vijay Chopra ...Respondent
Mr. Shaquiel Ahmed a/w. Mr. Aayush Pandey i/by. Mr. Gaurav Pandey, for the Appellant.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 13 September 2023.
P.C :
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Digitally SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2023.09.16 15:04:01 +0530
Ms. Rita Mohan Kaul alias Ruby Kaul
Mr. Vinjay Vijay Chopra
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
