The High Court held that the impugned order was not appealable under Order 43 of the CPC and disposed of the appeal.
liberty to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned order
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kishor 1/1 53 AO 138 of 23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.138 OF 2023
Karan Ahirwar … Appellant Versus Vaoo Adtech Private Limited … Respondent
Mr. Dushyant Krishnan, for Appellant in both Appeals.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 07 DECEMBER 2023.
P. C.:
. It appears that the Order impugned is not appelable under provisions of Order 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Appeal is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the Appellant to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned Order.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Digitally signed KISHOR by KISHORVISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date:2023.12.14 13:01:46 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order is maintainable in appeal under Order 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Karan Ahirwar
Vaoo Adtech Private Limited
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
