The High Court dismissed appeals and an interim application for want of prosecution, as appellants failed to appear and prosecute their cases despite prior notices.
Appeals dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-AO1006-2022.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.07.06 13:04:33 +0530
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1006 OF 2022
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2022 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2022
Azhar Ahmed s/o Zafar Ahmed Shaikh
...Appellant
Versus
M/s. Md. Taqi Md. Naqvi (Metals) …Respondent
WITH
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1128 OF 2022
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 107 OF 2022
None for the Appellants.
Mr. Mutahhar Khan, a/w Rujuta Patil, Yohaan Shah, i/b Negandhi Shah & Himaytullah, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 3rd JULY, 2023
PC:-
well, none appeared for the appellant. Therefore, the Court was
constrained to pass the following order:
1/2
13-AO1006-2022.DOC
prosecuting the appeals.
[ N. J. JAMADAR, J. ]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeals should be dismissed due to lack of prosecution.
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Azhar Ahmed s/o Zafar Ahmed Shaikh
M/s. Md. Taqi Md. Naqvi (Metals)
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
