Allowed

Sant Namdeo Nagri Patsan. Marya. Hingoli,Thr Its Executive Off. Sunil Ramashishprasad Singh (Sinha) v. Santosh Bhikaji Landge

Bombay HC18 Jul 2023ALP/24/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed applications for leave to file private appeals challenging judgments of acquittal, admitting the appeals and calling for records. Notice service waived by respondents.

What did the court decide?

Leave to appeal allowed; appeals registered and admitted; notice service waived; call for record ordered.

What the court decided

Sant Namdeo Nagri Patsan. Marya. Hingoli,Thr Its… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

998 & 999.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY PVT. PARTY NO.23 OF 2022

¶5

SANT NAMDEO NAGRI PATSAN. MARYA. HINGOLI,THR ITS
EXECUTIVE OFF. SUNIL RAMASHISHPRASAD SINGH (SINHA)

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

BHARAT CHANGDEV KAMBLE

¶8

AND

¶9

APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY PVT. PARTY NO.24 OF 2022

¶10

SANT NAMDEO NAGRI PATSAN. MARYA. HINGOLI,THR ITS
EXECUTIVE OFF. SUNIL RAMASHISHPRASAD SINGH (SINHA)

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

SANTOSH BHIKAJI LANDGE

¶13

...

¶14

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. S. Jaju
Advocate for Respondent in APEAL/24/2022 : Mr. S. K.

¶15

Chavan

¶16

Advocate for Respondent in APEAL/23/2022: Mr. S. N.

¶17

Kamble

¶18

...

¶19

CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:JULY 18, 2023

¶20

PER COURT :

¶21

1. Heard learned Counsels for both sides.

¶22

2.Prima facie perusal of the evidence on record

¶23

and impugned orders shows that case is made out for
entertaining appeals against judgment of acquittal.

¶24

Hence, applications for leave to appeal are allowed.
Both appeals be registered.

¶25

3. Both appeals are admitted.

¶26

Page 1 of 2

¶27

998 & 999.odt

¶28

4.Mr. S. K. Chavan and Mr. S. N. Kamble waives

¶29

service of notice of admission for respective
Respondents.

¶30

5.Call for record and proceedings in both

¶31

Appeals.

¶32

 (R.M. JOSHI, J.)

¶33

Malani

¶34

Page 2 of 2

Sant Namdeo Nagri Patsan. Marya. Hingoli,Thr Its Executive Off. Sunil Ramashishprasad Singh (Sinha) v. Santosh Bhikaji Landge

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Sant Namdeo Nagri Patsan. Marya. Hingoli,Thr Its Executive Off. Sunil Ramashishprasad Singh (Sinha) v. Santosh Bhikaji Landge

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Gangadhar Manchare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bhujang Uttam Kawale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashok Kashinath Jagtap Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dhananjay Mohan Zombade and Others Vs Prachi W/O Dhananjay Zombade

Priyanka W/O. Dipak Bhujbal Vs Dipak Begaji Bhujbal

Sant Namdeo Nagri Patsan. Marya. Hingoli,Thr Its Executive Off. Sunil Ramashishprasad Singh (Sinha) Vs Bharat Changdev Kamble