The Bombay High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application after finding that the applicant failed to comply with a granted undertaking and did not cooperate with the investigation despite interim protection.
Applicant's application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-aba-609-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.609 OF 2023
Rahul Vilas More ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Sunayana Kashid i/b. Mr. Vedchetan Patil, for the Applicant Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Pravin Jagtap, PSI, Pelhar police station.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2023
P.C.:
Vishal Parekar
...1
7-aba-609-2023.doc
cooperated with the investigation despite the interim bail having been granted on the said condition.
the applicant in not cooperating with the investigation, the application deserves to be rejected.
Hence, the following order.
ORDER
The application stands rejected.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar
...2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be rejected due to failure to comply with undertaking and non-cooperation with investigation.
Rahul Vilas More
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
