Rahul Datta Patil v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite a last chance being granted on a previous date.
The High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite a last chance being granted on a previous date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-aba-57-2023.doc
SA Pathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2023
Rahul Datta Patil … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
None for the Applicant.
Mrs. Veera Shinde, APP for the State-Respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 4, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Rahul Datta Patil
The State of Maharashtra
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court