Anticipatory bail application rejected for lack of faith regarding the applicant's case (payment of consideration) and necessity of custodial interrogation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30-ABA-43-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2023
… Prakash Rajaram Nikam Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Shaishav Savla instructed by Mr. Aadesh Konde-Deshmukh for the Applicant.
Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the State.
Mr. R.V. Bhosle, Poladpur Police Station, present.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 10 JANUARY 2023
P.C. :-
. This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for anticipatory bail.
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 2
30-ABA-43-2023.odt
Village : Poladpur. The applicant sold the said land to the other coaccused on the basis of power of attorney dated 1 August 2022 purportedly executed by the complainant. According to the complainant, she never executed the power of attorney in favour of the applicant nor she received any amount of consideration. The allegations are of impersonation.
(i) Application is rejected.
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2023.01.16 18:55:50 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant who is apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 420, 419, 471, 465, 467 IPC.
Prakash Rajaram Nikam
State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
