Allowed

Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 Feb 2023ABA/348/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by an applicant apprehending arrest for offences including robbery and assaulting public servant. Considering the applicant's minor role and willingness to cooperate, the court granted bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; applicant to release on P.R. bond of Rs. 15,000 with sureties; conditions to appear and not tamper with evidence imposed.

Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav Vs the… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Urmila Ingale

¶2

aba 348.23.doc

¶3

Digitally signed URMILAPRAMOD by URMILAPRAMODINGALEDate: INGALE 2023.02.1011:26:52 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 348 OF 2023

¶6

Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶7

Mr. Tushar Malvi i/b V.S.Tiwari, for the Applicant. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the State. PSI Mr. A.T. Shirke, Antop Hill Police Station is present.

¶8

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶9

DATE : FEBRUARY 9, 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned

¶12

APP.

¶13

2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail. The applicant

¶14

is apprehending arrest in connection with C.R. No.514 of 2021 dated 08/07/2021 registered with Antop Hill Police Station for offence punishable under sections 394, 324, 326, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, under sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act and sections 38(1)(A), 135 of Maharashtra Police Act.

¶15

1/3

¶16

Urmila Ingale

¶17

aba 348.23.doc

¶18

3. The allegation is that on 07/07/2021 at around 12:15 when the informant went to bring medicine for his mother, 3 accused started abusing the informant. One of the accused put his hand in the pocket of the informant and started taking informant’s money. The co-accused took knife and stabbed on the head of the informant when he resisted. The other accused stabbed the informant from the front. The victim suffered simple injury. The role attributed to the applicant is that he was holding the hand of the informant. 2 accused who are assailants have since been released on bail as against them, investigation is complete. The chargesheet is filed. The applicant is willing to co-operate with the investigation. Considering the role of the applicant and the fact that there is nothing to be recovered from him, the applicant can be granted the facility of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the following order.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(a) The application is allowed.

¶21

(b) In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R.No.514 of 2021 dated 08/07/2021 registered with Antop Hill Police

¶22

2/3

¶23

Urmila Ingale

¶24

aba 348.23.doc

¶25

Station, the applicant-Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

¶26

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer and should not tamper with evidence;

¶27

(d) The applicant shall attend the investigating officer on 12^th and 13^th February 2023 between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. and thereafter as and when called for.

¶28

The anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶29

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶30

3/3

Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Mahendra Yadav @ Hulchul Mahendra Yadav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pundlik Rajaram Palshetkar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Mohanrav Makhane Vs State of Maharashtra

Laik Lal Mohammad Khan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ghulam Irani Jafrey Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rahul Ashok Yadav Ad Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Abdul Hamid Sayed Vs State of Maharashtra